Growing the market for charitable contributions
I was having a discussion with some people from a charity organisation about the shape of the charity market and how there is a limited amount of funds for charitable contributions. This market was constrained as it was suggested that 25% of the population donates; it sounds right. As a result there was a fear that charities compete and they cannibalise the “supporters” or donations market. I was not sure that this was a large problem with all the new and old types of ways charities raise money. While the donations market is limited there is a larger market surrounding it which means there is really two markets here:
1) pure donation
2) normal purchases of products that people make, but in this case happens to benefit charities.
The first market is clear and well defined. A supporter gives money, gets a tax deduction and charity gets money.
The second market is not well defined and overlaps with the commercial market. In this market donor fatigue takes a long time to set in and for most consumers this budget is not part of their charity budget. For example, take a look at Christmas Cards or used books. Christmas Cards, I, like you, need them every year to send to friends, I can get them from the store or a charity.
If a charity reaches me first, I buy there. The money from this does not come out of my charity budget but my Christmas budget. I feel good that I know some money goes to the charity but it does not reduce my notional charity budget.
Similarly with used books, I buy what I want or need from Abebooks or a church sale, but when I buy from a church I again do not reduce my budget for charitable contributions, but my book budget is reduced.
Overall, yes the second market does reduce my disposal income but not to a degree that it effects the money I give to a charity. In this regard LetsGoForDinner.com will grow the market for charitable contributions because it does not consume the charity/donations budget.
Does this resonate or does someone have completely different data?
Cheers
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.